How Behavioral Biases Influence Where You Choose to Live

Key Takeaway: Where you choose to live influences your lifestyle, relationships, and long-term well-being. Five common behavioral biases can quietly shape that decision. When you recognize them, you can make more intentional, values-aligned choices about your living environment.

Deciding where to live is often framed as a practical task. We compare costs, school districts, amenities, and commute times. But in my experience working with clients, these decisions are rarely purely rational.

Our emotions, memories, and mental shortcuts quietly shape how we evaluate communities and envision our future. From nostalgia for a past chapter of life to the comfort of familiar neighborhoods, these invisible forces can influence major financial and lifestyle decisions.

Awareness does not make moving or staying simple. It does, however, make the process more thoughtful and aligned with what truly matters to you.

Below are five behavioral patterns I often see influencing relocation decisions, along with ways to approach them intentionally.

This article is a 5-minute read, or you can watch the video below instead:

5 Behavioral Patterns That Surface When Choosing a Place to Live

1. Status Quo Bias

People often stay where they currently live simply because it’s familiar, even when the environment no longer aligns with their life stage or values. For example, a neighborhood that was perfect for raising children may no longer fit once the kids have grown and moved out. Or a home shared with a deceased spouse can feel impossible to leave because of the memories it holds. I’ve seen this happen in my own family.

Problem: Status Quo Bias can prevent individuals from relocating to communities better suited for aging, connection, or support systems. This leads to missed opportunities for belonging, walkability, or better climate/healthcare access.

Solutions:

• First, digital relocation platforms (e.g., BestPlaces) help visualize tradeoffs across tax burden, community density, and healthcare access. Sometimes, visualizing yourself in a new environment can make moving more accessible.
• If you or your loved one finds the thought of relocating really challenging, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) tools like decisional balance worksheets can help challenge inertia.
• Academic research shows how default settings bias individuals toward inaction.

From a planning perspective, Mission Wealth Advisors can run side-by-side geographic comparisons, layering in housing liquidity, property taxes, maintenance costs, and long-term care considerations. When you see the full picture, the decision becomes clearer and less emotionally overwhelming.

2. Rosy Retrospection Effect

Many people romanticize the place they used to live. For example, “I was so happy when I lived in Santa Fe.” What we often forget are the stressors that were present at that time.

Research shows that we naturally remember the past more positively than it actually was. Nostalgia can be meaningful, but it can also distort expectations.

Problem: These decisions are filtered through selective memory, which often overlooks stressors at the time, leading to misplaced expectations for future satisfaction.

Solutions:

• Use journaling to analyze what truly created fulfillment (e.g., close friends, not the city itself).
  • Journaling apps like Journey or Reflectly help unpack emotional experiences chronologically and can inform whether the nostalgia stems from a place or an experience.
• And maybe just hold an awareness that, according to academic research, people misremember past events as more positive than they were.

In financial planning conversations, I often guide clients to define what I call a “fulfilled life profile.” Instead of focusing on geography, we identify the values, activities, and relationships that matter most. Then we evaluate which locations best support those priorities.

You can also create community-centered budget categories (e.g., memberships, cultural activities) and compare location fit accordingly. What does this location have to offer vs. other locations?

3. Familiarity Bias

Many people feel more secure choosing to live near where they grew up, attended college, or vacationed, without examining how that place aligns with their goals today. This may go hand in hand with Status Quo Bias that I reviewed earlier.

Problem: This bias can narrow our options and prevent exploration of locations that may better support diversity, accessibility, professional opportunity, or community engagement.

Solutions:

• Leverage motivational interviewing to explore ideal daily rhythms, not just geography.
• Tools like Nomad List offer ranked suggestions based on lifestyle variables like startup ecosystems, LGBTQ+ friendliness, or community engagement.
• Academic research shows people overweigh familiar options, often confusing comfort with competence.

From there, your Financial Advisor should be able to model different geographic scenarios, including proximity to adult children, social networks, and affinity communities (e.g., civic groups, religious institutions, libraries). Including qualitative factors in financial planning discussions often leads to more satisfying long-term decisions.

4. Ambiguity Aversion (Choice Overload)

With hundreds of cities, climate variables, tax structures, and cultural scenes, choosing where to live can overwhelm even the most rational planner.

Problem: Too many variables often lead to avoidance, reliance on defaults, or emotionally reactive decisions (“Let’s just move where our friends did”). It’s like when you go to the store to buy laundry detergent, and there are over 30 options to choose from.

Solutions:

• Break choices into manageable criteria (e.g., health care, safety, walkability, community interest groups).
• Use decision support tools like SmartAsset’s relocation quiz-style blog or custom-built MCDA tools.
• Academic basis: Iyengar & Lepper (2000) demonstrate how excessive options can decrease satisfaction and participation.

In planning meetings, we sometimes use weighted decision matrices. Clients assign relative importance to categories such as cost of living, access to nature, or proximity to family. This transforms a vague emotional decision into a structured evaluation that still honors personal values.

5. Impact Bias

People tend to overestimate how much living in a new location (e.g., a beachfront town or an artsy neighborhood) will increase happiness.

Problem: This can cause individuals to overcommit to expensive or isolating environments driven by emotional imagery, while ignoring deeper drivers of satisfaction, such as community, contribution, and routine.

Solutions:

• Academic research: Gilbert shows we are poor affective forecasters, typically overestimating the emotional impact of future events. So, think about who you will really be in this new environment. Will you bring the same challenges you have today to a new place, or will this new environment really solve some of the challenges you face in your current one?

One of the most practical strategies I recommend is testing a location before buying. Spend several months there. Experience different seasons. A ski town that feels vibrant in January may feel very different during shoulder season. Renting first is often far less expensive and disruptive than reversing a move that does not feel right.

Choosing a Home Is Both Behavioral and Financial

Where you live reflects how you want to spend your time, who you want around you, and how you envision your future. It is not just a financial calculation.

By recognizing common biases such as status quo bias, nostalgia, familiarity bias, ambiguity aversion, and impact bias, you can approach relocation decisions with greater clarity and confidence.

Partnering with a behavioral wealth advisor can help you balance lifestyle priorities with financial realities, giving you the clarity and confidence to create a home that truly fits your life.

If you are evaluating a relocation, downsizing, or lifestyle change, we would welcome the opportunity to have a thoughtful conversation with you.

About the Author

Steph Bruno is a Partner and Senior Wealth Advisor at Mission Wealth, serving clients in the Denver, Fort Collins, and Seattle areas. She helps busy executives and professionals navigate complex financial lives with customized investment management, financial planning, risk management, and tax strategies. With a focus on aligning finances with personal values, Steph guides her clients to achieve both long-term security and the freedom to enjoy life today.